That copyright file that everybody points to is automatically generated. Of
course it couldn't find everything! But now if you now look at the copyright
file, located at
http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs//main/c/chromium-browser/chromium-browser_51.0.2704.79-1_copyright
and run the following command:
$ grep License: chromium-browser_51.0.2704.79-1_copyright | sort | uniq
there is nothing there with an unknown license.
Also, why is Chromium given this much scrutiny as opposed to other packages
with large codebases like, say, Firefox? There are a few nonfree files or
files without source code in the firefox source package. You can see a list
of them in the Debian source package in the file debian/source.filter (these
files are unimportant and can simply be removed, as Debian does) and I am
copying the list here:
other-licenses/7zstub/firefox/7zSD.sfx
toolkit/mozapps/update/updater/macbuild/Contents/Resources/English.lproj/MainMenu.nib/keyedobjects.nib
toolkit/mozapps/update/updater/macbuild/Contents/PkgInfo
config/makedep.exe
intl/unicharutil/tools/data/case.dat
intl/unicharutil/tools/data/cmbcl.dat
intl/unicharutil/tools/data/ctype.dat
intl/unicharutil/tools/data/decomp.dat
intl/unicharutil/tools/data/num.dat
netwerk/protocol/ftp/doc/rfc959.txt
layout/doc
content/xml/tests
image/test/reftest/pngsuite-transparency
image/test/reftest/reftest.list /pngsuite-transparency/d
build/pgo/blueprint/valid.png
addon-sdk/source/examples/annotator/data/jquery-1.4.2.min.js
addon-sdk/source/examples/reddit-panel/data/jquery-1.4.4.min.js
