I'll be partly reiterating myself too:

* Following Debian testing is a lot of work and Trisquel does not have the adequate work force. Same observation for biannual releases.

* Most of the technical work achieved in the Trisquel project is writing package helpers (not theming). Basing Trisquel on Debian (rather than Ubuntu) would not ease the work because Ubuntu does not add freedom issues, except for the kernel (but the deblobbing script already exists). Try to list the package helpers in https://devel.trisquel.info/trisquel/package-helpers/tree/flidas/helpers that would become moot if the package was taken from Debian's repositories instead of Ubuntu's.

* Defaults matter a lot. Look around you: many people keep Windows' default wallpaper by fear of altering anything! In fact, the main reason why people use Windows is because it comes by default on their computers. Defaults even matter for highly technical users. For instance, one of the main critics to OpenSSL library is its insecure default configuration: most of the applications using it were keeping that insecure default configuration. I guess most users of Trisquel keep its default desktop environment. It is hard to prove that point though: the less skilled users (for example my parents and my brother, who exclusively use Trisquel) do not actively participate in the community. Many (most?) users cannot choose their applications from a list, by lack of knowledge. They have no idea what difference it makes to choose MATE or GNOME or KDE or Xfce or... if they even know what a desktop environment is. And it is perfectly fine: users should be able to easily free themselves, without having to know the names of the different free software programs.

* The Trisquel project has never dealt with "excelling the free drivers", "finding better substitutes for popular non-free apps", "polishing them", "developing a knowlegde/solution base for utilising unfriendly hardware and protocols", contrary to what you seem to believe. Almost no distribution does. Because that work had better be achieved upstream. Not at the level of the distribution. So that all distributions can profit from that work.

Reply via email to