"I do not know what the gpl says." Read it. It is no secret. It is available for everyone to see and know.
Now I notice your argument changes slightly to be about interoperability,
which is the first time you've raised that particular point and is different
from modifications in general. I imagine it's because of what you've been
reading. And yes, some places of the world have rules regarding
interoperability specifically, which I imagine you now know from what you've
been reading. So it is really going to come down to where the person is, what
their own laws are, and perhaps most importantly - what they are doing and
why. But regardless, the program in question remains non-free and the
abilities you refer to rely on local laws to make legal. It also raises the
issue in
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/is-ever-good-use-nonfree-program.en.html
which, again, all point to it depending on specifics.
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Why does no insider disclose the ... infinityfallen
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Why does no insider disclose the non l... J.B. Nicholson
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Why does no insider disclose the non l... svhaab
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Why does no insider disclose the ... onpon4
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Why does no insider disclose ... svhaab
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Why does no insider discl... infinityfallen
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Why does no insider d... jason
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Why does no insi... svhaab
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Why does no ... jason
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Why does no ... svhaab
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Why does no ... jason
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Why does no ... svhaab
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Why does no ... jason
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Why does no insider disclose the non l... calmstorm
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Why does no insider disclose the ... infinityfallen