Re: [Trisquel-users] Why does no insider disclose the non libre computer software?

[onpon4]

I tend to not agree with RMS's, what I would call, pedantry about exact  
terminology, but he is definitely right about the term "intellectual  
property". I happen to think that copyrights and patents should be abolished,  
each for different reasons, but trademarks should not. I would even be open  
to strengthening trademark restrictions a little, though I don't think it  
would actually be necessary. The similarities between these laws are so  
trivial and unimportant, lumping them together just doesn't make any sense.  
It's kind of like if we had a "radiation control" category covering anything  
that has anything to do with invisible, non-infrared radiation (including  
radio/microwave communication, microwave ovens, and nuclear power plants).  
Just because you can find some way to put several things into the same  
category doesn't mean you should.