> No copyright would actually mean the classical copyright, under the Berne
convention.
"No copyright" would mean that if my whole post was just these 2 words. But
those 2 words are extracted from a sentence which contains additional and
essential info.
https://unlicense.org/
> Good luck with your GitHub repository that only contains a license file
The license file exists because GitHub asks to select a license when creating
a repo and the repo was created because another GitHub member suggested that.
The chosen license reflects the intent and terms of what may follow (if I
have the time). It won't include contributions by contentious people who
copyright and license their forum posts. And yes - all the info about
browsers which I shared in this thread (including code) is free for anyone to
use as one likes. When sane people discuss and share something they don't put
legal warnings on each sentence.
If you have nothing to share about web browsers which can't be found on the
web and would rather talk about other things - please open a separate thread.
