[email protected] wrote .. > Or they could finish the Trisquel 8 release and then start work on Trisquel > 9... > > Seems perfectly reasonable to me, given how close Trisquel 8 is to a release.
That's what they're trying to do. I suggested it, and I got gung ho about getting into Trisquel development because I wanted to stop being a part of the problem and start being a part of the solution. But the X200 kernel panics in running VMs. :(
