The way I see it, you are lost from the very moment you try to
defend someone's innocence - haters will inevitably profit from the
occasion to claim everybody is guilty, even you who did nothing more to
try to defend someone's innocence. That is a form of censorship, and
people defending freedom stand against it.
Selam G. deliberately misquotes Stallman as saying that the girl
was "entirely willing" - and she's not the only one, I read more
articles stating the same lie. Stallman never said that. The critical
statement from Stallman was that "the most plausible scenario is that
she presented herself to him as entirely willing". There is an abyss
between that and stating that the girl was "entirely willing". On one
side, the truth. On another side, the lie. Selma's article is in the
side of the lie.
Are you supporting this lie, Narcis?
--
Ignacio Agulló · [email protected]
