El 18/9/19 a les 11:35, Ignacio Agulló ha escrit: > > The way I see it, you are lost from the very moment you try to > defend someone's innocence - haters will inevitably profit from the > occasion to claim everybody is guilty, even you who did nothing more to > try to defend someone's innocence. That is a form of censorship, and > people defending freedom stand against it. > > Selam G. deliberately misquotes Stallman as saying that the girl > was "entirely willing" - and she's not the only one, I read more > articles stating the same lie. Stallman never said that. The critical > statement from Stallman was that "the most plausible scenario is that > she presented herself to him as entirely willing". There is an abyss > between that and stating that the girl was "entirely willing". On one > side, the truth. On another side, the lie. Selma's article is in the > side of the lie. > > Are you supporting this lie, Narcis? >
Please, use a new "RMS trisquel" mailing list to continue this "full-of-sense" thread in current context. There you will have very interested people to chat about RMS, antarctic penguins and many other matters you want to develop.
