> Those repositories still require modifications in order to comply with
the FSDG, but so would Debian's "free" repository (main).
I seem to be a bit confused. But if Trisquel's repository have only free
stuff, it does not really matter whether based on Debian or Ubuntu or
Windows.
> You could contact them asking whether they plan to provide Linux drivers,
and if so, whether they would consider releasing these drivers under a free
software license.
Yes after new years holidays, possibly I will.
But I might have been Kumadori's side too much, because of the price for the
functions and the zero blocked contents. But I read some thread in this forum
and some user writes that Wacom has cooperated with Linux willingly or
friendly. It might be true, IDK. But Firefox Focus blocked 20-40 contents on
Wacom's websites. I do not understand which manufacturer is the best.
> The answer is that the precision difference between them is too big.
After all that was every man to his trade?
But how about the quality of adjunct digitizers of those Thinkpads compared
to Wacom's ones?
However, I started to think that Apple looks like a kind of religion. When it
was around 70s or 80s, Apple's products might have had actual technical
advantages but now it seems that there are only its ghosts. Even RMS (Ryu
Murakami sama) has said that "Macbook is Ferrari in the compurer world." in
around the year 2000. I think maybe he was deceived by Apple's myth, and
still now, too. He writes his works with his Macbook. It does not seem to be
librebooted.
Thanks everyone. I ordered Wacom one.
After that, I read nadebula's post and I checked that Krita's supported
devices list in haste. One was supported fortunately. I am a bit excited!
There seem to be quite a lot of painters here than I thought.
