> Windows is completely proprietary, and creating a modified version is illegal, so it would not be a suitable base.
I don't think so very much. But I am a beginner after all. So perhaps you are right.
> This is because that cult leaders make money by taking advantage of their followers' ignorance.
I would agree on their way of making money, but still, I was under the impression that at least Steve Jobs had been resisting him being a dog of the system but Bill Gates seems to be willing to live in his gorgeous doghouse without the sense of reality. I guess that US sort of threatened other countries or manufacturers and forced the adoption of Windows. Setting the 80% market share is unusual. The market share of Wacom seemed to be based on their technical advantage and the (a bit questionable) patent. Maybe Wacom had neither such power nor demands to force the adoption of technology to others. The system would not care if Wacom has 3% market share or a 90% market share. That is a different story from forcing to share Windows or Android. But indeed, some companies that have strong influence such as Khara switching to free/libre software would make the system have some concerns. That's wonderful news. I did not know the company. Ms and Mr Anno make normal good works. Evangelion got dull though. If some young people's startups started such a thing without normal support, perhaps they would be threatened or ruined by the system normally. I am not still sure if Wacom assists with the threats.
