On Wednesday, July 10, 2013 8:26:52 PM CEST, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Wednesday 10 July 2013 17:17:37 Caspar Schutijser wrote:
On Wednesday, July 10, 2013 5:00:27 PM CEST, Kevin Krammer wrote:
Creating a plugin for really old distribution versions or
RHEL6 (or older) might be a worthwhile goal on its own, I
am just not sure it should be the done as part of the GSoC
scope.
Do we have any opinion on that from the Trojita developers?
<snip>
I already wrote that if you want I will create akonadi plugin
too. So there is no problem that distributions will do not have
plugin using new kde api.
That's true. I replied to that question without thinking about your
earlier emails. Sorry.
I think it's nice to have a Akonadi plugin, regarding the deprecatedness
of KABC
That said:
I do not care that kabc is marked as deprecated. On my notebook
it is faster than akonadi. If you do not want to see kabc plugin in
trojita master git repo I will of course respect it and will prepare
akonadi plugin. But you cannot force me to use akonadi plugin
instead this kabc, if akonadi will be still slower.
I have nothing against a KABC plugin in the Trojita master git repo. The
nice thing about plugins is that one can choose which one you use. Since
you want to use KABC and you even are going to write the plugin, I don't
see a problem with that.
So my opinion summarized: if you would like to create two plugins (KABC and
Akonadi), that would be nice.
I don't know if someone has another opinion on this?
Best regards,
Caspar Schutijser
