************* The following message is relayed to you by [email protected] ************
Hi,
I was just reading this & am not sure what Dennis is referring to here: "I understood why Ron had failed in 1960. His efforts were valiant. He was almost doomed to fail. The actual legs, the actual postulates of the true GPMs aren't in the reactive bank. They're in the analytical mind. If you search in the bank, you will do it all wrong. It is an analytical construct, so they're in the analytical mind. All that is in the bank is a mish-mash of wrong opposers. The lies. The truth is in the analytical mind. So the mistake Ron made on the subject of goals was to look into a mass of lies, in the bank, for the truth. That is why the search went on forever, and why he nearly killed himself in the 1960s." I had looked up the Scn definition of "postulate" & nowhere does it say that it is generated by the reactive bank. I read the Scn definition of "gpm" & can see that it says "...Where the pc's goal meets constant opposition, you have in the reactive mind the resultant mass caused by the two forces ..." So the postulate is generated by the analytical mind but if opposed a mass is created which is in the reactive bank. Sooooo ... this seems to make sense to me but no doubt I am missing a HEAP of greater detail as to just how Hubbard proposed to remedy the "gpm" & "failed" as Dennis points out. Am I asking too much for a brief explanation of this? PJ www.wspa.org.au
_______________________________________________ Trom mailing list [email protected] http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
