************* The following message is relayed to you by [email protected] ************
How am I “tending” to “devaluate” RI and thereby losing the benefits? I haven’t had any cognitions regarding the second part of RI, nor did I think I was supposed to. I just thought it was a security measure to keep on course. How can I be spot on and tend to devaluate RI at the same time?
From: Martin Foster Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 2:33 AM To: The Resolution of Mind list ; [email protected] ; The Resolution of Mind list Subject: Re: [TROM1] level 2 ************* The following message is relayed to you by [email protected] ************ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- At 25/10/2010 Monday 07:22, John Boice wrote: I also donât understand why you picked out the last paragraph to invalidate while ignoring the other paragraphs and their originations which actually were the main points of my email. If Iâm doing something wrong, please explain so that I can change it, but right now I donât quite see what you mean, and am even suspicious of why Iâm somewhat confused as to your intention. JB Hi John, Well done on doing RI - I am certain Pete did not intend any invalidation of you personally. What we Trommers have previously experienced is that those who are used to Scio havingness process tend to devaluate RI and thereby lose the benefits. I found that the second part of RI - Having another mock up an importance is especially beneficial. For myself I've had tremendous cognitions on complementary postulates doing RI. You're spot on regarding RI. Martin -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Trom mailing list [email protected] http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
_______________________________________________ Trom mailing list [email protected] http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
