*************
The following message is relayed to you by [email protected]
************
I wanted to clarify the concept of Nirvana.
I find that the Buddhist and Hindu explanations to be quite involved
beyond necessity. It is really very simple. It is not a place or a
beingness in the sense of relating to anything in the physical
universe. It is certainly not a place. It is simply the state of
one's spiritualness. Only in the state of Theta or spirit can it be
achieved.
An interesting aspect is that LRH never defined it that I know of.
It is stated in its most simplest form as: any place of complete
bliss and delight and peace. Now there you see the concept of 'place'
being included. Let's just eliminate both words 'any' and 'place'.
It now becomes 'complete bliss and delight and peace'.
The interesting fact is that now one can see that one has many
moments of Nirvana or of being in Nirvana. A simple description of
such a moment is a 'Win'. "Deciding to do something and doing it;
deciding not to do something and not doing it." And I might add, DO
NOT ADD ANYTHING ELSE TO THIS. This is LRH's definition of a 'Win'.
Can you see that at that very fleeting moment of a 'Win' that one has
achieved Nirvana. It can become all encompassing and infinite as one
only ever decides to do something and does it or decides to do
nothing and does nothing.
Try that on. I think you will see that it is true.
_______________________________________________
Trom mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
