************* The following message is relayed to you by [email protected] ************
Leo,
There will be many weak minds who will argue to defend their deity to be right, and cannot be wrong. Weak minds are those who Dennis has cleverly overwhelmed and taken over. And who now can only think with Dennis' mind. Who can now only puppet, robot and parrot. LRH called such activity a slight aberration. He was being polite. Def from TROM manual: Intelligence This is the ability to evaluate relative importances; the ability to note differences and similarities between them. Thus, a person can be very knowledgeable, but if he is unable to evaluate the things he knows. he will be incredibly stupid. Stupidity is the inability to evaluate data. Ignorance is the lack of data to evaluate. Regards, David From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 14:07:42 +0100 Subject: Re: [TROM1] TROM Ethics (Leo Faulhaber) ************* The following message is relayed to you by [email protected] ************ Hi Leo Regarding (2) NEVER PREVENT A PERSON FROM KNOWING. I you remain silent, you prevent the child from knowing the danger. Shout: "Don't touch it". Ethics and common sense align very well. Regarding (4) NEVER PREVENT A PERSON FROM MAKING A THING KNOWN. In the presence of insanity ethics rules maybe get compromised. They neverthleless are valid. Take the old rule "Don't do to others what you don't want them do to you". If I rob you, you know that I don't want you to run after me. Still you run after me and this is ethically correct. Killing early Hitler? It is an overt and it isn't at the same time. Ethics and insanity don't align well. If you say NEVER PREVENT A ((SANE)) ((HONEST etc.)) PERSON then you can follow the rules 100%. Just my thoughts Roberto Von: Leo Faulhaber [mailto:[email protected]] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 6. Februar 2014 12:48 An: [email protected] Betreff: [TROM1] TROM Ethics (Leo Faulhaber) Hi everyone TROM Ethics consists of the following 4 rules: 1) NEVER FORCE A PERSON TO KNOW A THING AGAINST THEIR CHOICE. 2) NEVER PREVENT A PERSON FROM KNOWING. 3) NEVER FORCE A PERSON TO MAKE A THING KNOWN. 4) NEVER PREVENT A PERSON FROM MAKING A THING KNOWN. I have no problem with rule 1) and 3). But I do have some reservations with rule 2) and 4). 2) NEVER PREVENT A PERSON FROM KNOWING. Example: A child wants to touch a hot surface and there is some danger that it could burn itself. Shouldn't it be prevented from doing so? Wouldn't that be best for its survival? 4) NEVER PREVENT A PERSON FROM MAKING A THING KNOWN. Example: Someone promotes the idea that members of a specific ethnic group should be killed. Shouldn't he be prevented from doing so? Wouldn't that be for the survival of that specific ethnic group? Please let me know your opinions. Leo Faulhaber Hi Leo Regarding (2)NEVER PREVENT A PERSON FROM KNOWING. I you remain silent, you prevent the child from knowing thedanger. Shout: "Don't touch it". Ethics and common sensealign very well. Regarding (4)NEVER PREVENT A PERSON FROM MAKING A THING KNOWN. In the presence of insanity ethics rules maybe get compromised.They neverthleless are valid. Take the old rule "Don't do to others what you don't want them doto you". If I rob you, you know that I don't want you to run after me.Still you run after me and this is ethically correct. Killing early Hitler? It is an overt and it isn't at the same time.Ethics and insanity don't align well. If you say NEVER PREVENT A ((SANE)) ((HONEST etc.)) PERSONthen you can follow the rules 100%. Just my thoughts Roberto Von: Leo Faulhaber [mailto:[email protected]] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 6. Februar 2014 12:48 An: [email protected] Betreff: [TROM1] TROM Ethics (Leo Faulhaber) Hi everyone TROM Ethics consists of the following 4 rules: 1) NEVER FORCE A PERSON TO KNOW A THING AGAINST THEIR CHOICE. 2) NEVER PREVENT A PERSON FROM KNOWING. 3) NEVER FORCE A PERSON TO MAKE A THING KNOWN. 4) NEVER PREVENT A PERSON FROM MAKING A THING KNOWN. I have no problem with rule 1) and 3). But I do have some reservations with rule 2) and 4). 2) NEVER PREVENT A PERSON FROM KNOWING. Example: A child wants to touch a hot surface and there is some danger that it could burn itself. Shouldn't it be prevented from doing so? Wouldn't that be best for its survival? 4) NEVER PREVENT A PERSON FROM MAKING A THING KNOWN. Example: Someone promotes the idea that members of a specific ethnic group should be killed. Shouldn't he be prevented from doing so? Wouldn't that be for the survival of that specific ethnic group? Please let me know your opinions. Leo Faulhaber _______________________________________________ Trom mailing list [email protected] http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
_______________________________________________ Trom mailing list [email protected] http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
