************* The following message is relayed to you by [email protected] ************
Hi Colleen > "I once attended a speech given by an OT7 and he said that the best thing to > do is to get into the viewpoint of the "other" and from that viewpoint, > change your mind. Would that be pan-determinism at its best? "
That is what I was talking about with the tax man. Assume his point of view then change his/my mind as to pursuing Pete's bill is to small a goal "I should go after some of these big tax evaders." When going after big shots like the queen or the president you have to keep on mind that they have a whole entourage that presents their ideas to the world. They do not work as absolute dictators who can do what ever they want. So doing anything not according to their script will cause much upset from their staff, managers, bureaucrats and controllers. It is easier to change the little guy at the bottom of the bureaucracy like the tax man than to get the president or queen to do something out of character. Sincerely Pete McLaughlin Sent from my iPad > On Mar 15, 2016, at 10:01 PM, The Resolution of Mind list > <[email protected]> wrote: > > ************* > The following message is relayed to you by [email protected] > ************ > If you could easily and naturally get into the viewpoint of one of our > psychotic world leaders what would you do with that ability? If you could BE > that person? > > It is actually quite easy for me to get into the viewpoint of someone like, > say, The Queen of England, including all her perversions, psychosis, etc. I > could even say she is my "sister" and feel compassion for her even though she > has been able to cause much degradation....Too many lifetimes living amongst > the royals I suppose. It's as if I knew her when she was more sane, and > perhaps have some responsibility for her current condition. > > I once attended a speech given by an OT7 and he said that the best thing to > do is to get into the viewpoint of the "other" and from that viewpoint, > change your mind. Would that be pan-determinism at its best? > > It seems though that gradients are necessary re changing my mind when I am > her, because her case is quite severe, and I have to be willing to experience > that and find that small gradient towards sanity. It's tedious. > > I'm still playing around with this and don't have more than a passing > interest on the 3rd and 4th Dynamics right now, which is as it should be in > my case condition, but a resonance with her does come up every now and then, > and I go and take a look. At least I resolve in my own mind whatever was > resonating with her fears and jeers; however my compassion for her grows even > while she tries so hard to be evil and is doing a pretty good job of it too: > I don't think she would like it if I said that I see her as a sane being... > she is not one to be touched with a 10-foot pole, that's for sure... not in > my case shape. > > colleen > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > TROM mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
_______________________________________________ TROM mailing list [email protected] http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
