*************
The following message is relayed to you by [email protected]
************
Dear Marcus,
the tape lecture from 1961 you're referring to is not obsolete.
The e-meter which was in use at that time was the Mark 6 model.
When I got my C.o.S. academy training we used the Quantum Mk8 and
I remember a fellow student had one of those "antique" machines
in a wooden case to show it to us (I think it was an US Mk6
with a mechanical Tone Arm counter and a blue front cover) - a
real curiosity, like from another time and age. Never the less
the thing did what it was designed for.
In the lecture Ron talks mainly about the difference between
instant reads and latent reads on the meter. (Read refers to a
needle reaction on the meter.) The auditor is only interested in
the instant reads which are those appearing immediately after the
auditing question had been uttered or an item of an assessment-
list that had been spoken out. One allows not more than a tiny fraction
of a second for the read to appear. If a read appears later, then it
is a "latent read" and one never takes that as a valid read.
Your question is not quite clear to me because you mention that
you are not very familiar with emeters. So I assume you do not use
one for your processing (and it is not a requirement for TROM anyway).
So it seems to me that you had something mixed up here. The whole
issue of "change" that appears while running a process has nothing
to do with needle reaction times or delays in needle reactions.
The issue of "change" - or no change - is important in regard of
"flatness" (when you should end a certain process) of the auditing
activity at hand. And a change in that regard is just any change.
E.g. a mood change, an appearance or disappearance or intensity variation
of a somatic, .... and last but not least a change in communication lag
(which is the time delay between the uttering of the auditing command
or question and it's execution or valid answering). As a general rule
you can take it, that at least three consecutive equal communication lags
are regarded as "no change" - which indicates that the activity is flat.
At least for the time being. The same process can produce more change
later when you have run something else in the meantime. But if you
feel fine about the activity you leave it alone and go on to the next
step or end the session.
You mention "... chronically anxious and probably neurotic so I always
had sensations in abundance at all times ..." well, if this does not
change or resolve in one session or with one specific activity (like e.g.
RI) it can be regarded as a "no change". It seems to be something of
a greater magnitude - case wise. So you can assume it will require some
more work to resolve. More than can be done in one session or perhaps
more than can be done in one intensive. Never the less you will probably
register fluctuations overlaying the general abundance of sensations.
So it seem to me that the material in the tape lecture does not really
apply
to your auditing.
Best regards
Robin
-------
On Mon, 27 Mar 2017 14:00:03 +0200, <[email protected]> wrote:
Send TROM mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email protected]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of TROM digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Changes - Question about old data (The Resolution of Mind list)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2017 17:29:08 -0300
From: The Resolution of Mind list <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: [TROM1] Changes - Question about old data
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
I came across an interesting datum about changes. Lrh once mentioned in
an
old auditor course paper (How to Security check 6111C02), something along
these lines: the only response that you should consider in the emeter is
that one that happens within the first tenth of a second (considering you
had an standard emeter for that time - I dont know much about emeters let
alone their evolution).
So that gave me an insight I didnt have from the beginning of my
clearing
journey. I did develop an intuition regarding changes which is in
accordance with this datum, but nevertheless I didnt have noticed that
other changes could be disregatded. Example I'm chronically anxious and
probably neurotic so I always had sensations in abundance at all times
confusing my judgement; and also I always considered slower changes like
physiological changes as in the case when I do RI.
Could someone comment on the current validity or perhaps obsoleteness of
this?
Thanks
Marcus
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.newciv.org/pipermail/trom/attachments/20170326/537ac2fb/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
TROM mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
End of TROM Digest, Vol 149, Issue 5
************************************
_______________________________________________
TROM mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
