[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Glenn - I need some help here. I understood that the way I interpret the Bible is generally accepted among evangelical Christians.DAVEH: If that is truly the case, then would you not think that our Father in Heaven is a man? For does not the Bible testify that Jesus is the "Son of man"? Yet many times I have been told (by TTers included) that God is not a man. Using your method of interpreting the Bible, Glenn, it would seem like God is obviously a man. Do you disagree??? And when you answer, please bear in mind that you said "If it CAN be taken literal it MUST be taken literal." If you say God is not a man, then who am I to believe, YOU or the Bible???
Does anyone know? There are numerous books on Biblical interpretation.--Glenn - I've told you this before. If it CAN be taken literal it MUST be taken literal.DAVEH: I do not recall you saying such before, but I do have a bad memory. Is your above reasoning a commonly accepted method of understanding the Bible amongst other Protestants? And....is it accepted amongst Bible scholars? Or....is this just your personal way of understanding the Bible
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dave Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.langlitz.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
