[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Glenn - You didn't take the whole sentence. Notice the last line which I underlined for your convenience.DAVEH: Sometimes I read between the lines! <G>
Anyone who would continue to make the claim Mormonism is not divided, after the historical evidence is presented, then they are either liars or brainwashed.DAVEH: Or you don't understand what I've been trying to explain.
I do not believe you to be a liar, DaveL. I believe you to be a person of integrity.DAVEH: That is kind of you to say, and I would be insincere to suggest that you may be the one "to be a liar" now, Glenn! <VBG>
I did not intend to call you a liar.DAVEH: Thanx.........And, I'll try avoid the temptation also. :-)
Again, see the underlined phrase. I do believe you have spinned so much you believe your own spin.DAVEH: I know what I believe. But you seem to want to impose "your own spin" on what you think I believe.
My friend, whom I hope to meet one day,DAVEH: Annnnnnd.......I look forward to that day.
I believe you to be brainwashed. I do not want to offend you.DAVEH: Then perhaps you should quit trying so hard....... ;-)
--[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:DAVEH: Well Glenn, thank you for your honesty about how you feel aboutGlenn- This is why I have no respect for Mormonism. If they would just admit what is in their "Mormon revelation" then I could just agree or disagree. BUT BUT BUT they lie about what their "Mormon revelation" says. AND AND AND this lyingmy explanation of my beliefs. You and DavidM insist on telling me what the BofM says, and I have repeatedly explained how I (differently) understand it in context with the rest of itself and LDS Scripture. And for that, you suggest "this lying".Believe what you wish, as it is quite apparent that regardless of whatI believe, you will insist that I either believe differently or am lying.Glenn said - is by honest people who are brainwashed.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dave Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.langlitz.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
