Or just plain ignorant?
\o/ !HALALU Yah! \o/
Greetings in the Matchless Name of YahShua !
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Miller"
Sent: 01/23/2003 8:16 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Cell phones and
abortions
> Chris wrote:
> > Janet R. Daling et al., "Risk of Breast Cancer Among
> > Young Women: Relationship to Induced Abortion,"
> > 86 J. National Cancer Institute, 1584 (1994)
>
> Now that's a better reference, and as I suspected, the study has been
> mis-reported.
> > Janet R. Daling et al., "Risk of Breast Cancer Among
> > Young Women: Relationship to Induced Abortion,"
> > 86 J. National Cancer Institute, 1584 (1994)
>
> Now that's a better reference, and as I suspected, the study has been
> mis-reported.
Your erroneous bias has deepened your
blindness and led you to erroneous conclusions propped up in shanty-town fashion
by other erroneous studies that were developed precisely to
deceive.
> Here's what you wrote Chris:
> > "Every female 18 years and under who had an abortion, and
> > also had a relative afflicted by breast cancer (mother, sister or
> > aunt) was also afflicted by breast cancer by the age of 45!
>
> Please notice that this study ONLY INCLUDED CANCER PATIENTS! She
> interviewed 845 cancer patients from 3 counties in Washington state to find
> out if they ever had an abortion.
> > "Every female 18 years and under who had an abortion, and
> > also had a relative afflicted by breast cancer (mother, sister or
> > aunt) was also afflicted by breast cancer by the age of 45!
>
> Please notice that this study ONLY INCLUDED CANCER PATIENTS! She
> interviewed 845 cancer patients from 3 counties in Washington state to find
> out if they ever had an abortion.
From the abstract that you cited but did
not SIGHT!
"Similar information was obtained from
961 control women identified through random digit dialing within these
same counties."
My statement stands UNcorrected for the
most simple of logical reasons ... your alleged "correction" was erroneous upon
its face and most importantly of all because what I wrote is unequivocally
TRUTH!
I will be very short with you on the rest
of your brief because it is exceedingly soiled and deserves only the attention
any soiled brief deserves -- A GOOD SOAKING!
The Melbye "study" that you mistakenly
allege "was done much better" (again concluded only from just a quick glance of
an abstract) has been thoroughly discredited. It is a poor patch job upon
a gaping wound in the phlanks of the phraudulent pharmaceuticals and the
malfeasant monsters of medicine.
That study when HONESTLY analyzed in fact
was reported to show a 40% increase in breast cancer amongst those with induced
abortions. Ah, but that would take some TIME and EFFORT plus HONEST DESIRE
to find out!
> There are links to many other studies
that can be followed on this subject.
> I don't have the time or motivation to research this further right now.
> I don't have the time or motivation to research this further right now.
Ah, and there's the key, "the time or
motivation". Your lacking there coupled with your lack of vision precludes
you from finding, let alone SEEING TRUTH!
"A sincere person" you are? Then
sincerely deluded and sincerely wrong you are!
Sincerely AND clear as well as
right,
Ahava b'
YahShua
(Love in The
SAVIOUR)
Baruch
YHVH,
Chris
Barr, an underShepherd
little children of Jesus Christ
89 Homeplace Trail
Pocahontas, AR 72455
(870) 892-7843
