\o/ !HALALU Yah! \o/
Greetings in the Matchless Name of YahShua !
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: 01/23/2003 10:39 AM
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Wolf in sheep's clothing?

> Perhaps, Chris, you don�t provide your references because you can�t stand to have your conclusions challenged?

 

You have personally noted that "please" brought you answer.  In this instance I responded to the challenge by revealing it to be erroneous and the challenger to be erroneous as well.  Therefore my work stands UNchallenged.

 

> (FYI, David Miller has background in PhD science research. So sneer at that, if you wish.)

 

"For it is written, 'I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, and will bring to nothing the understanding of the prudent.'  'Where is the wise? where is the scribe? where is the disputer of this world?'  'hath not God made foolish the wisdom of this world?'" (I Corinthians 1:19-20 from Isaiah 29:14, 33:18 and 44:25)

 

B.S. = a very commonplace fertilizer the Italians call 'Bandini'

M.S. = more of the same

Ph.D. = Piled higher & Deeper

 

I would challenge David to put his money where my mouth is and together we can make a significant difference amongst the very few who will hear what The Spirit saith to the called out ones!

 

> If someone challenges your conclusion, wouldn�t it make more sense to argue the merits of your research, rather than making unloving attacks upon his character? Izzy

 

As already noted, I gave answer to the "challenge".  As for "unloving attacks", well, that brings to mind the phrase, "the pot calling the kettle black".

 

One notable street preacher once noted to another of me and my methods,

 

"Showing someone "love" and the "fruit" of a righteous person's
(evangelistic) actions will be exactly as has been done-they will be
truthful without interest to how it makes you "feel". What would you think
of a doctor who would rather spare your feelings by keeping the truth of his diagnosis from you, which otherwise would provide hope for your survival? I suspect you would rather have the hurt "feelings". Presenting the Gospel is no different; Jesus said that He came to "divide", to "fulfill the law", set at "varience", etc.. Love and brutal-truth are not mutually exclusive."
 
Ahava b' YahShua
(Love in The SAVIOUR)
Baruch YHVH,
 
Chris Barr, an underShepherd
little children of Jesus Christ
89 Homeplace Trail
Pocahontas, AR 72455
(870) 892-7843
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of little children of Jesus Christ
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 8:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [TruthTalk] Wolf in sheep's clothing?

 

Or just plain ignorant?

\o/ !HALALU Yah! \o/

Greetings in the Matchless Name of YahShua !

 

----- Original Message -----

From: "David Miller"

Sent: 01/23/2003 8:16 AM

Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Cell phones and abortions

 

> Chris wrote:
> > Janet R. Daling et al., "Risk of Breast Cancer Among
> > Young Women: Relationship to Induced Abortion,"
> > 86 J. National Cancer Institute, 1584 (1994)
>
> Now that's a better reference, and as I suspected, the study has been
> mis-reported.

 

Your erroneous bias has deepened your blindness and led you to erroneous conclusions propped up in shanty-town fashion by other erroneous studies that were developed precisely to deceive.

 

> Here's what you wrote Chris:
> > "Every female 18 years and under who had an abortion, and
> > also had a relative afflicted by breast cancer (mother, sister or
> > aunt) was also afflicted by breast cancer by the age of 45!
>
> Please notice that this study ONLY INCLUDED CANCER PATIENTS!  She
> interviewed 845 cancer patients from 3 counties in Washington state to find
> out if they ever had an abortion.

 

From the abstract that you cited but did not SIGHT!

 

"Similar information was obtained from 961 control women identified through random digit dialing within these same counties."

 

My statement stands UNcorrected for the most simple of logical reasons ... your alleged "correction" was erroneous upon its face and most importantly of all because what I wrote is unequivocally TRUTH!

 

I will be very short with you on the rest of your brief because it is exceedingly soiled and deserves only the attention any soiled brief deserves -- A GOOD SOAKING!

 

The Melbye "study" that you mistakenly allege "was done much better" (again concluded only from just a quick glance of an abstract) has been thoroughly discredited.  It is a poor patch job upon a gaping wound in the phlanks of the phraudulent pharmaceuticals and the malfeasant monsters of medicine.

 

That study when HONESTLY analyzed in fact was reported to show a 40% increase in breast cancer amongst those with induced abortions.  Ah, but that would take some TIME and EFFORT plus HONEST DESIRE to find out!

 

> There are links to many other studies that can be followed on this subject.
> I don't have the time or motivation to research this further right now. 

 

Ah, and there's the key, "the time or motivation".  Your lacking there coupled with your lack of vision precludes you from finding, let alone SEEING TRUTH!

 

"A sincere person" you are?  Then sincerely deluded and sincerely wrong you are!

 

Sincerely AND clear as well as right,

 

Ahava b' YahShua

(Love in The SAVIOUR)

Baruch YHVH,

 

Chris Barr, an underShepherd

little children of Jesus Christ

89 Homeplace Trail

Pocahontas, AR 72455

(870) 892-7843

Reply via email to