Hey there TruthTalkers.  

I'm way behind on keeping up with the e-mails.  There are more than 100
e-mails that are not read, so forgive me if I sound like I'm not reading
everything.  I know I won't be catching up today or anytime within the
next few days.  I'm heading out of town today to meet with some saints
tonight, and tomorrow I'm going out of state for several days.  I did
want to raise one thing with Dean about the false teachers thread we
have had.

Dean, the doctrine about present day revelation being of God is
something that I absolutely know to be true.  I am as sure of it as I am
that Jesus Christ rose again from the dead.  I have personally had many
of the same experiences that those in the Bible have had, and although I
have not met with God face to face like Moses did, God has spoken to me
with an audible voice from heaven.  I don't share that often because
people think I'm delusional or a cult leader, and some just think I'm
trying to lift myself up above them.  They don't know why God would
speak to me that way and not to them.  I don't know why either, so I
just don't bring it up.  Nevertheless, when a person has that kind of
experience, it doesn't matter what people say.  They can twist the Bible
all they want to argue God won't do that, but it looks really foolish to
someone who has already experienced it.  The debate rages mainly among
those who have never experienced it. 

You might remember Terry's response about how the Holy Spirit revealed
Christ to him.  Someone can argue with him until they are blue in the
face that he must have read the Bible and learned that way, or he heard
people on the radio or television and it sank in that way, but if Terry
knows exactly what happened to him, all their speculations mean
absolutely nothing.  Terry is the one who knows what happened and he is
responsible to be true to God and himself concerning what happened.  We
should simply respect his testimony and accept it, not try and argue in
a way that would be dismissive of it.

The following passage is helpful to consider in what I want to say next.

And he said, Hear now my words: If there be a prophet among you, I the
LORD will make myself known unto him in a vision, and will speak unto
him in a dream. My servant Moses is not so, who is faithful in all mine
house. With him will I speak mouth to mouth, even apparently, and not in
dark speeches; and the similitude of the LORD shall he behold: wherefore
then were ye not afraid to speak against my servant Moses? (Numbers
12:6-8 KJV)

Now we all know that Moses was a prophet.  Sometimes I think if I tell
people that I am a prophet, they think that I'm trying to make myself
out to be like Moses.  Unfortunately, I am not a prophet like Moses at
all.  The revelations that I have had do not even compare to him, and
the reason for it is probably because of the pride of life that is still
in me.  If I had that kind of revelation it would probably go to my
head.  In any case, the Lord in the passage above mentions a different
kind of prophet, one to whom God speaks in a vision or a dream.  This
refers to revelation that is less direct, called "dark speeches" in the
passage above.  This happens regularly in my life and is much more
descriptive of me.  Now I do not say that I am a prophet because I have
dreams and visions.  Every believer can expect to have that.  Rather,
the Lord himself has revealed to me that being a prophet is my place in
the body of Christ.  This is just part of knowing myself, who I am, and
what I am suppose to be doing in the body of Christ.  Some are ears,
some are noses, some are hands, etc., we each have a different function
and it helps us to understand our function and the function of others so
that we receive the diversity that God created in all of us.  My being a
prophet is simply a stewardship that God himself has given me.  Whether
or not anyone else understands it or agrees with it doesn't really
matter.  I have an obligation as a servant to be faithful to walk in
that stewardship.  I answer to God on judgment day for it, and I cannot
deny what Jesus himself has said to me.  To do so would be calling God a
liar, and he cannot lie.  In my mind, it is no different than someone
who is a mechanic being expected to fix cars.  This does not mean that
others cannot fix cars too, but a mechanic who is not fixing cars is not
really a mechanic.  I hope you can understand what I'm trying to say.
 
Anyway, the reason I am going through all this is not to prove that
revelation continues to happen or that there are modern day prophets
just as there were among the Christians of the New Testament.  My point
is to say that I KNOW these things to be true as clearly and truly as I
know that Jesus Christ rose from the dead.  I also am able to show from
the Bible that this is true doctrine.  So, given that I know these
things, let's consider your approach about false teachers. 

We both agree that we should beware of false teachers, but you think
that false teachers should be removed from the list.  In particular, you
and I both agree that there is false teaching in Mormonism. You reason
that because of this, Mormons of the list should be removed, whereas I
think they should simply be corrected by expressing the truth.  

Well, now consider this doctrine of revelation.  From my perspective,
there are others on this list teaching false doctrine about this.
Should I remove them also?  For example, Gary and Kevin have spoken
things that I know for a fact to be contrary to the Bible and contrary
to the Holy Spirit.  Do I kick them off the list just because they have
become false teachers in this area?  If you are tracking with me on
this, you will see that soon I would become a policeman of thoughts and
ideas, and I would be kicking most everyone off the list who embraced
some form of false teaching that was detrimental to the Kingdom of God.
This is not godly in my mind at all.  It is unprofitable and smacks of
everything unprofitable that we saw in Roman Catholicism concerning the
Inquisition, and everything unprofitable in Calvinism concerning Geneva.
I will not go there because I think it is important to learn from the
mistakes of history.  We also need to heed the Bible's teachings on this
subject.

Now I realize that this is a pragmatic approach here, but you must
understand that I cannot prove a negative from the Scriptures.  I can
only say that the Scriptures do not instruct us to excommunicate false
teachers.  The Scriptures instruct us to excommunicate those who sin.
The admonition about false teachers is "BEWARE" of false teachers.  I am
not aware of anywhere in Scripture where we are admonished to
excommunicate false teachers.  If you know of any, please share it.
Also, please consider that perhaps you do not see as much false teaching
as I do, so it might be harder for you to understand my reticence to cut
off false teachers.  Also, I have received the left foot of fellowship
more than once because I was considered a false teacher concerning the
gifts of the Holy Spirit.  Having been hurt by those experiences, I am
shy about treating others who are expressing different viewpoints in the
same manner.  I acknowledge that these are personal reasons that perhaps
unfavorable influence me away from excommunicating false teachers.  I
mention it to be honest and open with you about my thoughts and my
reasons for thinking like I do.  Nevertheless, despite these personal
reasons, I believe what the Bible says about rebuking and convincing
false teachers through our speech rather than through the arm of force
(excommunication). 

I hope you understand my perspective here a little bit better, and I
welcome hearing your thoughts about what I have shared.

Peace be with you.
David Miller, Beverly Hills, Florida.

----------
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you 
ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to 
send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.

Reply via email to