.
> What are you trying to say?  Are you saying that Jesus was a counterfeit
> man?
-------------------No, I am saying that He was more than a man.  A man, plus
God.
>
> The verse clearly indicates that Jesus was in the form of God, but he
> did not consider it something to hold onto.  He laid that aside,
> emptying himself, and took the form of a bond-servant.  He suffered
> death.  God cannot die.  Nobody can kill God.  Are you going to argue
> that his death was an illusion like the Muslims?  If his being a man was
> an illusion, then his death would have to be an illusion too.
-----------------His being a man was not an illusion.  Niether was His
death.
>
> Jesus could be tempted and he could be killed for one reason.  Jesus was
> a man.  Christ became flesh; he did not just look like flesh.
>--------This is true, but for lack of a better term, a man plus.  Not a man
like me, possibly even a better man than you.
> But Satan is completely unable to tempt the Father.  He was able to
> tempt Jesus because Jesus was fully man.  If Jesus was only God, then he
> would not have been able to be tempted.
--------------------In my opinion, Satan tempted the father in the book of
Job, but that is chasing rabbits.  What I wanted to point out is that even
though Satan tried to get Jesus to sin, he was unsucessful.  Jesus is God,
and God cannot sin.  The end result was a forgone conclusion.  The Father
wasn't biting His nails, waiting to see if the Son was too human.  There was
no need for a plan "B".
> You seemed to ignore the passages that I shared that said Jesus was made
> a little lower than the angels.  Is God below angels in your
> perspective?  You have a lot of explaining to do.
-------------Sorry, no explanation.  I would have to speculate about what
lower than the angels means, and my speculation may not be accurate.  I can
tell you this.  God cannot stop being God for one moment, or He would not be
the same forever.
>
> Terry wrote:
> > But God cannot stop being God for one moment,
> > and God cannot sin, so though Satan TRIED
> > to tempt HIm, the end was never in doubt.
>
> What do you mean by saying that Satan TRIED to tempt him?  Are you
> saying that Satan tried to tempt him but really was unable to tempt him?
> Why would angels minister to Jesus after his temptation experiences if
> he was not truly tempted and enticed just as we are?
-------------See my explanation above
>
> Peace be with you.
> David Miller, Beverly Hills, Florida.
>
>


----------
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you 
ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to 
send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.

Reply via email to