> > > > > > > > > >of...... > > > > > > THE EPISTLE OF PAUL THE APOSTLE to the HEBREWS > > > > > > .......is not part of the inerrant Bible, and that we really do not know > > > who wrote the book of HEBREWS. Is that belief commonly accepted amongst > > > most Protestants, or do many take offense at such a suggestion? For > > > instance......would KJV ONLY folks find such a thought disagreeable? > > > How about TTers.....Some like g have fought pretty hard to make me > > > believe the Bible as we have in its modern form (translations) is > > > inerrant. Would you disagree with SB, g? > > > > > ============================================================ > > Dave: > > Are you certain that you heard Steve Brown correctly? I would be > >surprised to find that he felt Hebrews not to be inerrant. > > > DAVEH: Perhaps you did not understand what I said above, Terry. SB > said the HEADING of Hebrews is not part of the inerrant Bible. He did > not say Hebrews itself was not a part. > > > I know Steve. > > > DAVEH: Really!?!?!?! That interests me. I really like his style and > knowledge. I just wish I could question him about many things as I do > you and other TTers. He seems very knowledgeable and easy to listen to. > Do you listen to his radio program? > > > I > >thought I knew him well. He played a part in leading me to the Lord. He > >has eaten at our table. Even though he is a little liberal, > > > DAVEH: ROTFLOL......If you were to listen to him (on the radio) much, I > think you would understand why I find that so humorous. > > > he is a godly > >man. > > I have no doubt that he would not say the "epistle of Paul", because the > >writer of Hebrews is unknown to us, > > > DAVEH: That was the reason for my initial questions. I was wondering > how other Protestants perceive it. Vincent suggested there are several > evidences that give reason to believe it was written by Paul. > > > but it is part of the Christian Bible, > >placed there by the leading of the Holy Spirit. > > > DAVEH: A few years ago I made the statement that I believe the Bible to > be the word of God as far as it is translated correctly. At the time, I > received a lot of flack from other because of that comment. Now SB > (and apparently you too) are suggesting there are things in the Bible > that are in error, but you (or at least SB) qualify it by saying it is > not a part of the inerrant part of the Bible. I wonder what part of the > Protestant community sees it the way you and SB sees it. > > > Some think it was written > >by Apollos, but only the Lord knows for sure. > > Terry > >======================================================== > >Perhaps I did not express myself well. I did not mean to imply that any portion of the Bible was in error. I cannot prove that it is inerrant, but I must believe that it is, or else start picking and choosing what I want to believe or disbelieve. I do not think that God would allow error to be part of His message to the world. Terry > > > > > > -- > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > Dave Hansen > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.langlitz.com > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > If you wish to receive > things I find interesting, > I maintain Five email lists... > JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS, > STUFF and MOTORCYCLE. > > > > ---------- > "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org > > If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. > >
---------- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
