Here is something I do agree with DavidM. DavidH IS a Mormon. I would expect him to refer to that teaching from time to time. He is great, i believe, in supporting his doctrine with KJV, leaving out of the discussion (generally speaking) the other Mormon writings.
John
In a message dated 4/14/2004 8:09:49 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I understand Dave to be saying that the reason he is here is not to
teach LDS theology. In other words, his purpose for being here is not
to proselytize or teach others about Mormonism. That does not mean that
he will never teach LDS theology while he is here. I really don't
understand your problem with this. It is kind of like stopping at a gas
station for gas, but then after you are there you decide to buy a coke.
Did you go to the gas station for gas or a coke? It seems reasonable to
me that if people are going to ask Dave about his beliefs, or if he is
being challenged about his beliefs, then he might share what his beliefs
are, even if they are LDS in origin. Such does not mean that his reason
for being here has changed anymore than someone would argue that you
stopped at the gas station for a coke just because you bought one. Your
real motivation was to get gas, not to get a coke.
