From: Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Judyt: Another thing that bothers me is why some appear to be so hung up on hell and the lake of fire

daveh:  I'm hung up on it because I find the popular Christian perception to be very interesting.  To me it is obviously symbolic, but to most Christians it seems to be a literal lake of fire.  Yet (to me) it seems so illogical.....That a loving God would punitively punish people who never had the chance to accept/believe Jesus by physically torturing them forever.  Seems pretty harsh.....even for the wrath of God, does it not!  Contrast that to the Lord's story of the prodigal son.....do you find both teachings to be at odds?
 
judyt: No, have you ever pondered what would have become of the prodigal son if he had not repented and was found on that day in the pigpen?  Why would you call this "obviously" symbolic Dave.
 
PS Have visited the website and taken note of these notes on hell, what do they say to you? I don't find much symbolism in the parable of Lazarus and the rich man who found himself in Hades. Lazarus has a name which indicates personhood. This parable is every bit as valid as the prodigal son.
daveh:  Do you understand parable to be a story that conveys a concept while in itself may not have actually happened?...... http://m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=parable&x=0&y=0
Both were taught by Jesus.  I don't His find truth to be at odds at all.  God is loving but he is also holy and perfectly just. Noone will spend an eternity in torment who has not personally chosen this end. One could
say that the parable of the prodigal son illustrates the moral principle of repentance before acceptance by
a Holy God and how doing one's own thing causes separation and what does the parable of Lazarus and the rich man teach?  That there are different destinations for the righteous dead and the unrighteous dead? Now
whether or not all of Mr. Landstrom's notes on hell are valid this parable taught by Jesus is in and of itself
important.  The rich man was miserable enough to want to go and warn his brothers not to come there.

daveh:  From what I've learned previously in TT, anybody who dies without believing in Jesus is condemned to the lake of fire.  (I assume you agree???)  Yet there are literally billions who have lived and died without even hearing the name of Jesus, let alone hearing the gospel.  So......if they (through no fault of their own) don't believe in Jesus and end up being eternally tortured in the lake of fire......what commentary does that speak of a loving God?  Or......do you believe that they will be given the chance to believe in Jesus after their death?  I think virtually all I've chatted with about this deny this possibility though.
 
judyt: It is appointed unto men once to die and after this the judgment (Hebrews 9:27); the Church has been given the great commission (see Matthew 28:19,20) and Romans 1 addresses this also.  Jesus created the worlds and everything is held together "by the word of His power" which means he also created us and
Romans 1:20 tells us that "From the creation of the world His invisible attributes, that is, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood through what He has made. As a result people are without excuse..."
 
daveh:  My personal world is immersed in Jesus.  However, I can think of many instances of people(s) who could/would not have heard of him.
 
judyt: Your Jesus is not the Creator of the worlds Daveh, I'm not an expert on Mormonism but from what I do understand your church teaches he is less than what the scriptures teach, so this is "another gospel" and
a "different Jesus".
daveh:  The problem with that is it is questionable as to how many actually heard the truth.  If you and I knocked up a non Christians door in a proselytizing effort, and you first taught him what you know as the gospel, and then I taught him my perspective of the gospel.......and then he chose to believe mine---you would assume rejected the truth, while I would assume just the opposite. 
 
judyt: Do you know the origin of the word "occult" Daveh?  It has it's origin is in astrology as when for instance a man sees a magnificently bright star through his telescope and tells his friend "come here, look at this" but when the friend puts his eye to the lense a comet moves in front of the star, covering and posing
as the real so that it's light is dimmed and the friend's reaction is "what's so great about that?" There are
many occult gospels out there.
 
daveh: So it seems that there are many versions of the truth right here in TT.  Imagine a non Christian viewing the gospel being preached by underwear waving protesters.  Would they run to embrace that truth, or would they run from it.  And if they did find that form of truth to be repulsive, do you think God is going to chuck them into the lake of fire for not accepting such a negative presentation of the gospel?
 
judyt: I don't agree with the method or the message of many street preachers and to be honest I would not have been drawn to their message or their persons in many cases but I can rejoice in that Christ is named..
As for their end, I am not the judge; they will be judged by the words Christ spoke John 12:48, just like the rest of us.
daveh:  Do you suppose the wrath of God might possibly refer punishments of mortality, rather than punishments that extend beyond the grave?  I've not done a study of it, but it sure seems to me that God has shown his wrath to mortals when they happen to be engaged in efforts to thwart the gospel.   One of these days (if I ever find the time), I'll have to see what relation there is between the wrath of God and hell.  Perhaps you already know, and can quote some passages that connect the two?
 
judyt: My understanding is that it happens while we live and the wicked are reserved for the day of destruction. God disciplines those he loves and he uses the instruments of his wrath to do this. Moses in Psalm 90:9 writes that "all our days are passed away in thy wrath, we spend our years as a tale that is told".
Of course, we are living in a new day but God's standards have not changed.
daveh: Without some negative result, what motivation would Christians have to seek the truth?  Jesus told us the truth would set us free.  Free from what, if misconceptive (can't think of the proper word for that one!) Christians can be saved?
judyt: Free from the lie that damns the soul and incurs the wrath of God.
 
daveh:   Hmmmmmm.....as DavidM suggested, it isn't misperceptions that  damns the soul, but rather sin.  But if I remember correctly, you may disagree with him on that.
judyt: We are either slaves of sin or we are slaves of righteousness, we choose one or the other and this
point goes right back to Romans 1, to the people who hold the truth in unrighteousness. People who
know there is a God but who make no effort to find out who he is or to learn his ways even though by way of the creation his existence has been evident from the foundation of the world.  

daveh:  Which brings back the question:  Is one damned from sin or misconception?   (Or.......both?)
 
judyt: They are siamese twins arn't they?  God gives us a measure of time to get it together.
daveh:  If we keep the commandments, we shall know the truth....
 
judyt: What chapter and verse is this?
 
daveh:  It is my summation of a couple passages......Jn 8:31-32
 
judyt: He actually said "If ye continue in my word then are ye my disciples indeed, and ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free" and he said this to the Jews which believed on him. So what
commandments did you have in mind?
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

Reply via email to