|
No Slade I
don't, but I do believe in the truth and accuracy of scripture. Blood libel
according to a Jewish website is as follows: The blood libel, an allegation that
Jews murdered non-Jews for blood to make their Passover matzahs and for use in
other rituals was one of the worse DEFAMATIONS and LIBELS in
history. Untruths have the potential to become popular beliefs. These trumped up
accusations were combined with the delusion that Jews were not human and had
recourse to special remedies and magic in order to appear like other men. The
blood libel led to many massacres of Jews and Jewish trials in the Middle Ages
and the "blood libel" was again revived by the Nazis and has been used by
anti-Zionists to defame the Jews.
What is your definition, then of the Jewish people being
responsible for the death of Jesus? Deicide, or being libel for the blood of
Jesus? Thank you for giving me a definition of Blood Libel. I placed both
the concept of Deicide as well as the matzot story in the same category. Perhaps
I should not do
this.
jt: The apostle Peter blamed them and so did Stephen a
man full of the Holy Ghost, faith, and power. Why do you take this so
personally? judyt
I don't take it personally. Peter blamed certain
individuals. He didn't blame the race. Do you blame certain individuals or do
you blame the race?
|
- [TruthTalk] Hyperbole (Slade) Judy Taylor
- RE: [TruthTalk] Hyperbole (slade) Slade Henson
- [TruthTalk] Hyperbole (slade) Judy Taylor
- [TruthTalk] Hyperbole (slade) Slade Henson
- [TruthTalk] Hyperbole (slade) Judy Taylor
- RE: [TruthTalk] Hyperbole (slade) Slade Henson
- [TruthTalk] Hyperbole (slade) Judy Taylor
- RE: [TruthTalk] Hyperbole (slade) Slade Henson

