To John and Judy and all,
The bloodline of significance to this discussion is the one containing the Seed promised to Eve in the garden. I would like to point out that Jesus did not come through Ishmael but Isaac. The Ishmael comment is irrelevant to the subject at hand; he has nothing to do with the truthfulness of our premise.
 
jt: Ishmael is relevant in that he is contrasted with Isaac to show that the seed is spiritual in nature rather than fleshly (see Galatians).  The promise is also a spiritual one with the seed of the woman (Jesus) a life-giving Spirit.  God made the first man Adam  a living soul and the second Adam (Jesus) a life-giving or quickening Spirit (1 Corinthians 15:45-50)
 
There is only one bloodline leading from Eve to Jesus. It is the Seed promised to Eve, again to Abraham, through Isaac and Jacob and Judah, then David and on through the ages to and through Mary to Jesus.
 
jt: The genealogies in both Matthew and Luke have Joseph as Jesus' father. His mother is not mentioned - women are usually not included in these genealogies and anyway Luke 3:22 precedes the genealogy in Luke with the voice from heaven which said "Thou art my beloved Son in thee I am well pleased" then in Vs.23 "And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph which was the son of Heil etc. etc.
 
Gentiles are included in that blood through our common heritage in Adam through Eve, the giver of life. This is why Jesus can be the Kinsmen Redeemer, because we are related to him by our common blood.
 
jt: Why do you take a spiritual reality and try to make it something in the natural? 
 
When the covenant was cut with Abraham, he slept. It was a unilateral covenant, in other words, the fulfillment being dependant upon God's faithfulness to his promise concerning the Seed, and not upon Abraham's obedience or any of the rest of ours.
 
jt: Really?  Then who is the God who spoke through the prophet Jeremiah saying "they are turned back to the iniquities of their forefathers, which refused to hear my words; and they went after other gods and the house of Judah have broken my covenant which I made with their fathers. Therefore thus saith the Lord, Behold, I will bring evil upon them which they shall not be able to excape and though they shall cry unto me I will not hearken unto them" (Jeremiah 11:10,11) Dosn't look to me like He (God) is doing the whole thing. Where do you get that idea from?
 
Sure there are consequences for disobedience, just like blessings for obedience, but the covenant stood because God was faithful to his promise in and through his Son, the Jew Jesus Christ; its fulfillment being made in him. In other words, Jesus stood in for the sleeping Abraham as his substitute and his representative. Being the God-man, Jesus fulfills the entire covenant.
jt: Uh, huh!! Then there shouldn't be any lawless people or covenant breakers since he keeps the whole thing - right?  Who are these people who think they are following him, the ones who cast out devils and do all sorts of things In His Name - The ones who come to Him on that day saying "Lord, Lord!" We have eaten and drunk in your presence and you have taught in our streets - and he responds: "I never did know you, depart from Me, all you workers of iniquity"  .. So He does the whole thing??

Before discounting what I say, why don't you all trace the bloodline. You will find that the Seed passes unsevered through the entire OT. God included the whole human race in his promise to Eve precisely by narrowing its fulfillment down to but one representative man, his Son Jesus Christ.
 
jt: We can agree that Jesus is the Promise .. I guess that's better than nothing... Flesh and blood don't inherit the Kingdom - you are barking up the wrong tree.

Reply via email to