Re: [TruthTalk] Read it and weep!

[Lance Muir]

So then Terry, pick a passage, any passage at all. Show it to the 'audience'. Now, let each offer their respective 'interpretation' (after seeking the Spirit's guidance of course). Then, not unlike the middle ages where guilt or innocence was determined by submerging the plaintiff under water for a time beyond human endurance. Those who drowned were innocent. We'll use the standard that anyone disagreeing with Terry, Judith or Linda does not 'have' the Spirit of God. Thereafter we'll 'judge' their participation, particularly when quoting Scripture, accordingly.     ----- Original Message ----- From: Terry Clifton To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: October 04, 2004 20:11 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Read it and weep! Don't you see that if God through the Spirit interpreted a passage, He would only need to make that presentation to one person and then ask that rest of us give credence to that single individual.   Judy thinks her view is from God through the Spirit, but not so with Lance, or Slade, or little old me, or Terry or Jonathan, or the Gman, or DavidH or Jeff (who owes me a responding post, by the way) or whoever happens to disagree with her at the time.   You are basing your opinion on human reasoning; not on God�s Word. Everyone who is led by the Spirit will agree with the Spirit. Where we disagree with scripture, someone is not hearing the Holy Spirit. ================================================== Uh  uh!  No no no!   Don't put poor old Terry in with a bunch that think the grammer rules of men are better than the leading of the Holy Spirit.  I pray each day that He control me more and the world control me less.  I fear that, like Jerry Clower used to say, "Some of you have been educated way beyond your intelligence".  If shepherds and fishermen and tax collectors can understand the Word without grammatical rules, so can I. No hard feelings, but I don't want to even be anywhere close to a group that thinks that way.  Lightning might strike the whole bunch. Terry