RE: [TruthTalk] 613 Commands

[ShieldsFamily]

Judy, I beg to disagree that it is “both”; as “good” and “bondage” are mutually exclusive terms. Izzy   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Judy Taylor Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 6:58 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] 613 Commands     jt: Both. All of God's Word is good in balance and in context that is, when we allow scripture to say what the author intended. There are clearly two Covenants involved here and to insist that those who have been made free in Christ must also adhere to the Law of Moses is putting them back into legalism and bondage.   On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 09:59:53 -0600 "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Judy, You have just contradicted yourself.  If you “don’t have any objection to any commandment of the Bible because every word of God is good,” then why do you call it “that kind of bondage”?  Either it is good OR it is bondage.  Which? Izzy     jt: I don't have any objection to ANY commandment of the Bible because every Word of God is good. However, why put people back under that kind of bondage when we have been given liberty in Christ?