I say Abraham was VERY active. Izzy -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Miller Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 11:11 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Unilateral Covenant?
Bill Taylor wrote: > I will go with what Lance and Slade have > written. They handled it quite nicely. They did? Lance took several emails to finally say that he would characterize Abraham as an active participant. Slade did not answer the question directly, but seems to indicate that active might be his answer, depending on how I might understand that word. Now John S. has considered switching his answer from passive to active, but I'm not sure he has done that. To tell you the truth, I am about to give up on this thread. If you guys cannot deal straight forwardly with simple terms like active and passive, you have told me what I need to know about your beliefs. It is like Bill Clinton arguing that his answer all depends upon what the word "is" means. Meaningful dialogue about this particular truth becomes meaningless when so much time is spent dancing around a simple question. Are you sure you won't take a position of either "active" or "passive"? Peace be with you. David Miller. ---------- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. ---------- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
