Re: [TruthTalk] Toward a (biblical) Unilateral Covenant

[Knpraise]

In a message dated 11/29/2004 9:50:57 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: In a message dated 11/29/2004 1:07:10 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] "disagrees [w\ BillT] without being disagreeable"   howso(?); elaborate, pls I am kind of stuck, here, G.    If I explain in any detail at all, I run the risk of giving David reason to "rebuke" me.    All I can say is that in his post,  much of which I disagrred with, he seemed to be concerned with not being misunderstood as being too critical   Now, I am aware that David had questions  nearly every major point of Bill's paper  --  but, for my thinking,  he made an effort at making his questions the central issue rather than what he thinks of the author, or the anger of God,  or whatever.   It may prove to be a myth but for now, I will give David the benefit of any doubt.  J