I was using the "not absorb prevalent amillennialism" as an example to show how what we're taught in the academy doesn't necessarily become part of us, even when we're taught a topic ad nauseum. I am Pre-Mil-Post-Trib at this point, but when I look at the Messianic fervor of the 1 BCE through 1 CE era, I wonder about that as well.
 
No. I never heard of N T Wright. I can put him on my "to read list when I have time or when I'm forced to by the classes I take" list.
 
-- slade
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Sunday, 12 December, 2004 05.41
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Is Truth always rational?

Slade:Please expand on 'not absorb prevalent amillennialism'. Why not? Where are you on this eschatological spectrum? Are you conversant with the 'realized eschatology' ala N. T.Wright?

Reply via email to