Re: [TruthTalk] TOE revisited

[Lance Muir]

You could start by reading the bookof Ecclesiastes. Further, as both yourself and Judy are even more evasive (question-answering wise) than Lance this a of m. will you attempt to answer the questions I put to Judy. Further, though I believe Judy thinks that Scripture is self-interpreting, may I ask if you do? ----- Original Message ----- From: ShieldsFamily To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: December 20, 2004 11:33 Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] TOE revisited Upon what scripture do you base that belief? Izzy   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir Sent: Monday, December 20, 2004 9:13 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] TOE revisited   They are mind/brain/consciousness + a package of chemicals. That's allllll folks. ----- Original Message ----- From: ShieldsFamily To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: December 20, 2004 09:58 Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] TOE revisited   Lance, Humans are �One� what??? Izzy   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir Sent: Monday, December 20, 2004 6:49 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] TOE revisited   I've always admired the research 'tools' used by David & yourself. This would be an excellent opportunity for you to employ them. Many, Judy, believe as you do on the nature of HK..(one, bipartate, tripate) I allign myself with 'monism'. God is One and we are One. Thus endeth the lesson ('til you engage in some linguistic homework) ----- Original Message ----- From: Judy Taylor To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: December 20, 2004 07:43 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] TOE revisited   jt: Can you show me your foundation or basis for these emphatic pronouncements about humankind Lance?   On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 07:27:31 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: HK is a living, while breathing, soul. HK does not HAVE a soul but IS soul.HK is not spirit nor do we possess A spirit. May I, preemptively, suggest that on this very important topic, language (original) matters. Hebrew 'monism' is our template here. Paul, in no way disagrees with this. On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 15:59:37 -0500 "Slade Henson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Essence "Spirit, Soul, Body (Triune Being)" has nothing to do with he "Us" in the Creation narrative. Essence has nothing to do with God being "One." jt: Of course it does Slade. God is Spirit and Man is spirit; being made in His image is what differentiates mankind from the animals.     The Hebrew text (as a rule) deals strictly with action,i.e., verb forms as opposed to static "To Be" forms. For instance, Echad (One) in Deuteronomy 6:4 is a VERB. -- slade   jt: How IYO would the above change the fact that God is Spirit and so is Man?