I hear where you're going, Izzy. Let me ask you a question... If a person is the problem, how does one say the person is the problem without it being an ad hominem comment?
 
Heck... even when one addresses the issue outside of finger pointing, the ad hominem accusation raises anyway!
 
This is very much like the anti-Lashon Hara people who use the "Your guilty of Lashon Hara" card to keep people form correcting them.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Monday, 20 December, 2004 12.44
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] TOE revisited

Slade, could you please re-post your definition of ad hominem? I can’t find it. Izzy

 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2004 11:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] TOE revisited

 

The problem, dearest Judy, is you IMO.

Reply via email to