I am not speaking of your plagiarism. I really care less about it...
jt: Then why do you
continue to feed comments like Gary's and help to keep the issue alive?
You know, like "he who is without sin?"
JBH: You (Judy) labeled what Gary said as an ad hominem. It wasn’t. You were wrong. You accused a brother of
something that was not true. When David thought that John did this he went off
his rocker and threatened to shun John. When you do it we just smile and say, “there
she goes again”. And as usual you refuse to accept the moderator’s authority.
You wouldn’t let you kids get away with this type of behavior but you like to
express it here.
unless you were jabbing pin and needles
into others for plagiarism. Sometimes the words of another human being
expresses our thoughts better than we can. I also don't care about "cuss words" unless it's overdone. These are not holiness issues to me.
jt: So it does not
bother you if sweet and bitter water come from the same fountain?
JBH: Sweet and bitter water come from
your typing hands daily. As proved to you lately sweet and bitter water have
come from Finis Dake.
I am extremely concerned over hypocrisy. I
fear it in my own life and I yearn for people to express their concerns
regarding the hypocrisy they smell in MY life. This trait manifested in the
last week, and you have NOT repented
of it.
jt: Excuse me? I
have publicly repented/apologized to people on this list and I have dealt
with my own heart before the Lord. Do you need something special Slade? I'm
sorry that this does not measure up to your standard. Will you forgive me?
JBH: You halfheartedly apologized to
people on this list. Bill accepted it. What Slade points out is that while
you apologized for your plagiarism you did not apologize/repent of your
hypocrisy which is well documented on this forum. You have been called on it
and we should all expect David Miller to jump on you like he jumped on John
threatening that you be shunned and removed from fellowship until you have
repented. If he does not then we know that he just has it in for John and
could care less about the rest of the forum.
In fact, you hide behind weak screens like
"Dake is not a theologian" and "Dake
was a spirit filled man which I believe gives one more insight into
certain truths" which makes it all
right for YOU to quote him, but quotes of other men are worthless, incessant wadings.
jt: The late Finis
Dake was not a theologian and what I quoted was truth no matter where it
came from. But Truth appears only a minor issue here some seem to be much more
interested in nit picking.
JBH: Finis Dake was a theologian. You
are a theologian. Please learn the term. Is a theologian only one who gets
paid to theologize? Silly. Truth is much more of an issue here than you seem
to be able to see. There are few people that I know of that nit pick more than
you do. The old plank in the eye thing Judy.
All you have to do is go back through
those archives and see how many times you say something like "all I need
is Scripture." What's worse, is you criticize the Pharisees for being
hypocrites!!!
jt: What I meant to
convey is that if we are going to major on talking about truth we would be
better off to stay with Scripture; as for the Pharisees, Jesus called
them hypocrites so I am in agreement with the Master. They put loads
on other people that they weren't willing to carry themselves and I'm beginning
to wonder if there isn't some of the Pharisee spirit here right now.
JBH: You change your tune more than an
old piano. Scripture does not have a monopoly on truth. You have yet to use
scripture in this post. Blah blah blah.
Apparently, the fruit doesn't fall far
from the tree.
JBH: A
typical poke. Nice bitter water coming from this water fountain.
THIS is the issue of greatest concern. It's not a case of rubbing it in.
jt: Then why do you
keep doing so and delving into all the details again when you do it?
JBH: Because you have a lot to learn about
yourself. Please learn it so we don’t have to continue to do this with you
every month.
It's a case of wishing you the best in
your life. Hypocrisy will destroy
you unless you give it to God. -- slade
jt: What does God want
with it Slade? My you have a back handed way of wishing me the
best in life - Like nothing I say makes a dent in whatever you have already
concluded concerning me. But Oh well, all I can say is that I am so
glad God does not hold grudges.
JBH: You don’t think God holds grudges?
Hmmm somehow I think you are misleading people here. Do you think God sends
people to Hell? Sounds like quite a grudge. Love me or burn!
P.S. I asked a
question about the two messages that went astray Slade - up front and out
in the open, giving you the opportunity to respond in kind...
jt: Others can do whatever they like
Slade. I just got weary of being confronted with the doctrines
of certain men over and over, and over,
and over on TT. Also I don't use my Dake's Bible in any closet,
it's right out there on the table with
the others and I've made no secret of the fact that that I have one.
BTW since I have publicly repented
for this why is it not dropped? Is God in favor of beating ppl
over the same offence 70 times 7?
The thread should be defunct and yet you the Moderator go on to
feed Gary's insult as follows:
myth (e.g., reflectg on her exchngs, even with you: her posts indicate
her monolithic presumption
of theolgicl
superiority)
Within
the context of this thread, I disagree.
jt:
The mind boggles; in light of the above gets by then what left
to moderate??
PS:
The reason I am responding publicly is because you initially posted this
publicly which David has
