|
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Judy Taylor Sent: Monday, 27 December, 2004 22.42 To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judy's Plagiarism s: I am not speaking of your
plagiarism. I really care less about it...
jt: Then why do you continue to feed comments like Gary's and help to
keep the issue alive? You know, like "he who is without sin?"
NEW BY SLADE:
Those who use this comment are generally those who
do not want to be made accountable for their sin. I'm glad this is not your
motivation.
s: unless you were
jabbing pin and needles into others for plagiarism. Sometimes the words of
another human being expresses our thoughts better than we can. I also don't care about "cuss words" unless it's overdone.
These are not holiness issues to me.
jt: So it does not bother
you if sweet and bitter water come from the same fountain?
NEW BY SLADE: In my opinion, you
are mixing issues. I think biting sarcasm (that you see me do as well at
times), refusal to admit wrong and move on, hated for the brethren, calling
brethren names, condemning brethren to the lake of fire with our mouths or
the voice in our head, etc., are the bitter waters.... NOT THE
OCCASIONAL WEAR WORD. The HEART dear, is the fountain... not the
mouth. The mouth is merely a port for the water to
drip.
s: I am extremely
concerned over hypocrisy. I fear it in my own life and I yearn for people to
express their concerns regarding the hypocrisy they smell in MY life. This trait
manifested in the last week, and you have NOT repented of
it.
jt: Excuse me? I have
publicly repented/apologized to people on this list and I have dealt with
my own heart before the Lord. Do you need something special Slade? I'm sorry
that this does not measure up to your standard. Will you forgive
me?
NEW BY SLADE: See
below
s: In fact, you hide behind weak screens like "Dake
is not a theologian" and "Dake was a spirit filled
man which I believe gives one more insight into certain
truths" which makes it all right for YOU to quote him, but quotes of
other men are worthless, incessant wadings.
jt: The late Finis Dake was
not a theologian and what I quoted was truth no matter where it came from.
But Truth appears only a minor issue here some seem to be much more interested
in nit picking.
NEW BY SLADE:
What you quoted was one man's opinion that you agree with. Who
cares? What Jonathan or anyone else quotes they perceive to be
true as well (or it amplifies a point they're trying to make).
There's nothing wrong with that. We have people on this group who spent hours
writing drippy commentaries on Bush. That's not Scripture... where was your
rebuke for being outside Scripture then? I resisted getting into the political
foray as much as
possible.
s: All you have to do is go back through
those archives and see how many times you say something like "all I need is
Scripture." What's worse, is you criticize the Pharisees for being
hypocrites!!!
jt: What I meant to convey is that if we are going to major on
talking about truth we would be better off to stay with Scripture; as for
the Pharisees, Jesus called them hypocrites so I am in agreement with
the Master. They put loads on other people that they weren't willing to carry
themselves and I'm beginning to wonder if there isn't some of the Pharisee spirit
here right now.
NEW BY SLADE: Major??? A
rhetorical question because only you and Bill (and perhaps DavidM because I bet
he's got quite a library) are able to answer: How much of your arguments
originate from Dake's writings? Yes. I agree with the Master as
well. You defined yourself, thus proving you are still unrepentant. The
"Pharisee Spirit" reflects on the computer screen in Judy Taylor's home. Look,
Judy... do you see your reflection?
s: Apparently, the fruit doesn't fall far
from the tree.
jt: The Pharisee tree?
NEW BY
SLADE: Hmmmmm.....
s: THIS is the
issue of greatest concern. It's not a case of rubbing it
in.
jt: Then why do you keep doing so and delving
into all the details again when you do it?
NEW BY SLADE: I haven't, I
don't wish to, but I can....... I don't want to because the last time I did, I
think I unduly embarrassed one whom I lover
dearly!
s: It's a case of wishing you the best in
your life. Hypocrisy will destroy you unless you give it to God.
-- slade
jt: What does God want with it
Slade? My you have a back handed way of wishing me the best in
life - Like nothing I say makes a dent in whatever you have already concluded
concerning me. But Oh well, all I can say is that I am so glad God
does not hold grudges.
NEW BY SLADE: No back
hand given, Judy. I'm only telling you how I understand it. Your right, however,
G-d holds no grudges, but he may stop your "spiritual" growth until you
learn the current lesson. That would be
tragic.
jt: P.S. I asked a question
about the two messages that went astray Slade - up front and out in the open,
giving you the opportunity to respond in kind...
NEW BY SLADE: I
did respond. See the attached
email.
|
--- Begin Message ---I have no power to keep posts from posting. Thank you for thinking the best of me.--slade-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Judy Taylor
Sent: Monday, 27 December, 2004 21.44
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 19:36:35 -0500 "Slade Henson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:I usually glaze over with the long posts (I have innumerable interruptions each minute), but I'm glad I stuck this one out. We see things similarly, even though we get to the end through different mindsets.Thank you for the time you spen[d/t] here. -- sladeGlad to see John has a fan in you Slade, However this is a sanitized version of what both he and I sen t to the list and I have not seen my replies to John here even though I sent this post through twice. What happened to it? Do you have the ability to moderate before it reaches the list or is this some fluke? Should I send it again or will you allow only one side of this debate? judyt
--- End Message ---
