RE: [TruthTalk] The place of creeds in relation to truth

Fri, 31 Dec 2004 10:44:04 -0800

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Friday, December 31, 2004 6:08 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The place of creeds in relation to truth

 

Izzy:In 'Amening' David on this business of creeds, may I ask:

 

1. When you speak of Jesus what would you mean for us to understand?

The guy who died on the cross.

 

2. Is you RCC family member on an equal footing, 'credally' with yourself?

Why? I have no interest in their “creeds”.  Their RCC theology is erroneous

On many crucial points.

 

3. Is every person on the face of the globe on an equal footing 'credally'

so long as they, by the Spirit of God, read and believe Scripture?

As I said, creeds don’t matter to me. One’s doctrine matters on a few issues,

But not that many issues.

 

4. Is it accurate to speak of both everyone, as per number 3, being

'correct' when speaking of Jesus' Gospel yet, in another sense, everyone

being 'incorrect'? I do not understand the question.

 

4. If the 'plumbline' for 'truth' is Scripture then: a. is every word that

we use beyong Scripture somehow 'relatived'? Define “relatived”.

 b. Is our very choice of any Scripture over another itself 'relatived'

becuase both a & b are a kind of 'credal' statement? I don’t understand the

question.  Izzy

 

Reply via email to