I believe that what is 'is' regarding creation. I'm probably not a 'creationist' ala 6 day young earth creationism. Such would entail both bad science and bad exegesis (IMO). Where, David, do you place yourself on this 'spectrum'?
----- Original Message ----- From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: January 01, 2005 15:37 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The place of creeds in relation to truth > Lance wrote: > > I believe that even had that (unnamed) thingy > > never occured the Eternal Son would still have > > Incarnated. > > This sounds like evolutionary theory is your working paradigm. Is this > true? Do you believe in evolution (perhaps theistic evolution) as the > proper model for our origins? > > Peace be with you. > David Miller. > > > ---------- > "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org > > If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. ---------- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
