Re: [TruthTalk] Believing scripture

[Lance Muir]

ï When I said something like 'there wasn't, there isn't and won't be ANYWHERE OUTSIDE OF GOD', I meant that to trump any biblical 'counter reference whatsoever' Therefore, one needs to differently understand (quaint ain't it?) 'separation'. I believe in universality not, universalism (so far).   I believe God to be 'unconditional in love'. I believe God to be unconditional in forgiveness'. When we read Scripture we ought to 'indwell' through to the HEART OF GOD. Biblicists beware! You 'wrest' s(small s)cripture to your own...(whatever).  ----- Original Message ----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: January 01, 2005 21:10 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Believing scripture In a message dated 1/1/2005 1:48:50 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Jeff, I have no idea where YOUR venom came from below.  Judy gave us a scripture that explains exactly the remedy to Lanceâs statement that At the core, I believe real change to be more apparent than real. To quote myself, "Who you are at six is who you are a sixty.  This is not âthe divisive and argumentative spirit of this individualâ  This is the power of God to change a person completely.  I can attest to it personally.  Can you? Izzy It has been my experience on this forum that, when the dust settles,  one side was speaking from a totally different point of view from the other.   Both were right, if you will, but only one side could admit that.   Is it possible that Lance is using this term "separation" in a different but legitmate way.   Now, I know, he could make that clear  --   but, among friends and fellow disciples, does he really have to.   I happen to like what Lance and Gary do with their posts   --   their style of writing is such that the only way you can gain knowledge from their presentations (at times)  IS TO ASSUME THE BEST of them and actually try to figure  out on your own what would have to be true for you  -- that would allow you to say exactly what they say. JD