Your post (that you could have remembered
writing easier than me retrieving it) is attached to this
email.
So we don't begin with a rabbit trail, What is
your definition of Private
Interpretation.
From: Judy Taylor
Sent: Saturday, 15 January, 2005 09.52
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Private Interpretation
If you will send me my quote in the balance and context I wrote it in Slade - I will be glad to oblige. judyt
Sent: Saturday, 15 January, 2005 09.52
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Private Interpretation
If you will send me my quote in the balance and context I wrote it in Slade - I will be glad to oblige. judyt
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 09:45:43 -0500 "Slade Henson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
What, Judy, is your interpretation of "Private
Interpretation?"
--- Begin Message ---Then John you have your own private interpretation so that what God says about it makes no difference to you...At least this is the way it appears to me. His word clearly says SIN IS LAWLESSNESS - and it also says that noprophecy of scripture is for private interpretation. 1 John 3:4 is just as inspired as the rest. judytOn Fri, 14 Jan 2005 01:36:10 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:In a message dated 1/13/2005 10:29:49 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:jd: Judy, you really do not have a clue as to "the practice of lawlessness." Your use of the phrase "This is sin" forces this conclusion.
jt: Just agreeing with God's Word John ie: "Everyone who practices sin also practices lawlessness and sin is lawlessness" (1 John 3:4).
Like I said, Not a clue.
John
--- End Message ---

