Re: [TruthTalk] Traditional Christian theology -- does sham mean anything

[Judy Taylor]

 

 

On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 11:20:12 -0500 Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

I don't have any "teachings" that are my own John; my goal is to agree with the "Teacher" so I can

receive and walk in His doctrine with those who are likeminded. So if you call that "stupid" then that is

between you and the Lord. I wouldn't take it as a personal insult but may be grieved in my spirit over

such ignorance and this would not be conducive to any kind of fellowship between us. jt

 

On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 11:05:58 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

So, no problem with calling your teachings stupid?  Did you somehow overlook the purpose of my post.  John

 

In a message dated 1/19/2005 6:41:04 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:Why not?  We should be able to be Berean here which is to compare different teachings alongside the Word of God
How does one insult a teaching it is either true or false and if false it needs to be brought to the light. If a person holding on
to it as truth is insulted then they are holding on too tightly and it is a chance to let go.  Only truth will stand in that day.
 
I count only four contributors on this forum who apprently can't comply.  4 out of 14 contributors  --   obviously it can be done.
And you don't overlook anything considered negative.    Nothing.  John

jt: Comply with what John?  Is there some kind of rule book I don't know about?  jt