In a message dated 1/21/2005 9:53:02 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


DAVEH:  This is where I fail to understand the Protestant (forgive me if I'm lumping too many people together on this one, DavidM) perspective.  IF Jesus and the Father are one, does it not seem a little contratidictive that Jesus has a physical body, and his Father does not?  As two separate Gods, each having different characteristics might make sense, but most Christians want to tie them together in a oneness theory, that seems conflicting to me.  Can Jesus and God be separate and distinctly different persons/Gods from a Protestant perspective?

Just because they are ONE does not mean they have to have a body.
The bible says that a married couple are ONE Flesh.
Does this ONENESS ThEORY CONFUSE YOU also?
Do you have all the equipment she has?
Does it seem as U say "a little contratidictive" that she has a _________ and you do not?
Details in the Holy Bible.



My vote is against a flesh and blood body for the Living Resurrected Christ.  Just FTR.
Philosophically impossible when we consider omipresense.

JD

Reply via email to