In a message dated 1/21/2005 11:31:10 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

A 'philosophical impossibility' is NOT ( I repeat not) the deciding criterion on such matters.


Too much dependence on my own sense of philosophical soundness?  In other words,  why? 

Would I John 3:2 have anything to do with the discussion. 

JD

Reply via email to