On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 20:10:03 -0700 "Bill Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Terry wrote: No, not suggesting that at all.  God did not plan for the fall.  Had He done so, there would have been no sin on Adam's part because, being compelled to follow the plan, he would have had no free will to sin.  Adam made his own choice to disobey God, and as his heirs, we inherit the punishment (death) for that sin that Adam willingly committed. Though either term could accurately be used, I simply think of my Savior more as my redeemer than as an adopter.  I wondered how you saw it.  I believe that the fall was not necessary for adoption, but a redeemer was necessary because of the fall.  Terry
 
jt: God in his foreknowledge had to have known it [the fall] was going to happen since Jesus is the lamb who was slain "before the foundation of the world".  However, God always gives us space and if we hang it is always our own choice, not His since it is not His will that any should perish.[even though we are aware that many will].
 
Bill writes: This sounds really good to me, Terry. Since we do live on the side of Adam's fall, it is always somewhat speculative to talk about what it may have been like had he not rebelled. I understand Paul to be saying that we were predestined to adoption by Christ, and this before the world was created; in other words, long before the fall.
 
jt: The Church is what God predestined in Christ before the foundation of the world and whether or not Jesus claims either of us as a member of His Church when the day of reckoning comes remains to be seen though we are given a measure of faith and we have this glorious hope. We have been predestined to become conformed to the image of His Son - not adopted as is.
 
For those who deny the fall (I understand you are not one of these Bill) I would like to know how mankind went from the image of God [Gen 1:27 God created man in his own image, male and female] which in fact is the image of Christ [Jn 14:9 "If you've seen me you've seen the Father] to being by nature children of wrath [Eph 2:3].  Just how did this happen without the fall?  So in Christ we are predestined to return from whence the first Adam fell.
 
I may be going out on a limb with this, but adoption cannot necessitate a fall without indicting God in the process.
 
jt: Why?  How is God indicted for man's choices and why would an adoption even be necessary aside from a fall? If Adam had remained in God's image and likeness this adoption would not be an issue because there would have been no breach..
 
Adoption has to have been possible apart from the fall, or God is guilty of making us the sinful creatures we have become contra the fall. And so, I agree with you: if the fall had to happen, then Adam is at most only partly responsible for his disobedience. 
 
jt: I understand you may choose not to answer this Bill but I don't get it.  Why would adoption be necessary apart from the fall and how do you figure God is responsible for Adam's choice to disobey his clear instruction.  Please help me?
 
And since we live on this side of the fall, I also agree with you that "Redeemer" is certainly what our Savior is, and I think it quite appropriate to think of him in those terms. Good stuff,  Bill
 
jt: It follows that needing a "Redeemer" implies that there is something we need to be redeemed from - whereas all adoption implies is that we are orphans. Shirking responsibility for his choice was the first indication that Adam wasn't where he should be. Let's not repeat his error by continuing to deny the problem..
 
Bill Taylor wrote:
What if we use the word "redeemed" instead of the word "adopted"?  In your opinion, would that make a difference?
Terry
 
Hi Terry,
 
Yes, I do think it would make a difference if we use the word redeem instead of adoption. But I'm not sure why you are asking this question; I think I am probably misunderstanding your intent. Redeemed is what we are as a result of what Jesus has done in our place and on our behalf. But Redemption comes only as a result of the fall. I do not think we would need to have been redeemed were it not for sin and death, both having been introduced by the fall.
 
Are you suggesting that God created us in order that he might redeem us?
 
Help!
 
Bill
 =================================================
 

Reply via email to