Of course. When you review the ongoing 'conversations' within the cliques/camps on TT what headway do you see being made? The more literate among us (that'd exclude me) could occupy both sides of any conversation while 'speaking' (writing) under the name of virtually any person.
Is this not so?
For the sake of discussion, let's assume agreement of "hell" as existent and some place we do not want to be. Are honest respondents hell bound if their didache is in error? We can have a judgment scene thusly recorded:
St. Peter: "Hi and why are you here?"
Respondent: "Well, I have come to enter in. Is there a problem?"
St. Peter:"Depends."
Respondent: " On what."
St. Peter: "Your qualifications."
Respondent: "The continue flow of the blood of the Lamb -- actually, I see him, way over there, sitting next to that hugh ball of light."
St. Peter: "Well, I must say, you have a good idea on that "continual flow" thing. And I like that you poured yourself out for the hungry -- I have that entry right here in the Book. All your kids not only became disciples, but had done more than you. A noteworthy thing, I might add. But guess what."
Respondent: " Ah -- what?"
St. Peter: "You were wrong on the instrumental music issue. Sorry. Too bad you did not get the Message that trying your best is not good enough."
Reponsdent: "Dang" as he slaps his forehead with the palm of his right hand.
Enterying the room marked "Hell," he notices that many in this room also have flattened foreheads.
I personally, do not believe there will be any flattened foreheaded people in that room.
JD
