RE: [TruthTalk] On occupying antithetical positions

[Debbie Sawczak]

I apologize for the arrogance of my suggestion, below, that ANY of you might fit in my head. Of course none of you does. I substituted people for positions.   Debbie   As to ventriloquism: there are some people on this listserv under whose name, with a little effort, I could probably write. Others delight and bewilder me by continually stretching the mental shape I have for them. But then, I'm not that literate either.   Debbie -----Original Message----- From: Lance Muir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2005 9:32 AM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] On occupying antithetical positions Of course. When you review the ongoing 'conversations' within the  cliques/camps on TT what headway do you see being made? The more literate among us (that'd exclude me) could occupy both sides of any conversation while 'speaking' (writing) under the name of virtually any person. Is this not so?  ----- Original Message ----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: February 03, 2005 09:20 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] On occupying antithetical positions In a message dated 2/3/2005 5:17:39 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Kevin says: 'They will not change by skilled reasoning.' Please describe the nature of the content of your own posts, Kevin. Are we witnessing the wisdom of God or, the wisdom of Kevin? If a Mormon I, I'd be quite unmoved. On the whole they (your arguments) are quite supercillious. I do beleive that a worthy point of discussion would be one which includes an understanding of just why it is that honest people disagree on most any issue. J