The point being, that if an argument is true for all, it's association to a particular group is not a significant argument.
Sorry you did not grasp the significance here.
The distinction is that the LDS I ask are Trained Professionals!
TWO whole weeks at MTC
Then off to Mission and tell folks about Eternity
2 years of that and they can be a RM and a full grown boy.
Most missionaries I know stay on the field for a life time and know the Bible
Not so LDS Missionary Boys
Is my question too hard for your average Christian Missionary?
There is no comparison between the two groups.
Do you know what a RM is?
Returned Missionary.
In my book a RM is a FAILURE.
Sort of like a Kamikazee Pilot that comes back with his best uniform on and his plane all shined up!
100% of the LDS Missions force is RM!
100% of the LDS Missions force is RM!
Lets talk about some histories of Christian Missionaries past & present. These guys are not RM's
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/3/2005 8:15:49 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I agree many do not know the scriptures. That is why they are a good mark for the cults.
Or false prophets or from one's own failure. The point being, that if an argument is true for all, it's association to a particular group is not a significant argument. That's all.
JD
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
