In a message dated 2/4/2005 4:22:49 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
She didn't manipulate a thing she printed the whole verse verbatim and she was not manipulating Jesus' words either. He called the Syrophoenician woman a "dog" which is someone outside the covenant. Swine are pagans/unbelievers. Why wouldn't Mormons qualify with all of their extra biblical teaching and ritual? They give a false assurance and are void of Truth. jt
What if I think "pearls before swine" more aptly applies to the Miller Four. Is that allowed. Or is the Miller Four the only alliance on this "truth talk" forum against whom the verse is not permitted?
- Re: [TruthTalk] Ad Hom Farce ttxpress
- Re: [TruthTalk] Ad Hom Farce Judy Taylor
- Re: [TruthTalk] Ad Hom Farce Kevin Deegan
- Re: [TruthTalk] Truth talk or Relative talk? Kevin Deegan
- Re: [TruthTalk] Ad Hom Farce Knpraise
- Re: [TruthTalk] Ad Hom Farce Kevin Deegan
- Re: [TruthTalk] Ad Hom Farce David Miller
- Re: [TruthTalk] Ad Hom Farce Lance Muir
- Re: [TruthTalk] Ad Hom Farce Knpraise
- Re: [TruthTalk] Ad Hom Farce David Miller
- Re: [TruthTalk] Ad Hom Farce Knpraise
- Re: [TruthTalk] Ad Hom Farce David Miller
- Re: [TruthTalk] Ad Hom Farce Judy Taylor
- Re: [TruthTalk] Ad Hom Farce Judy Taylor
- Re: [TruthTalk] Ad Hom Farce Knpraise
- Re: [TruthTalk] Ad Hom Farce Terry Clifton
- Re: [TruthTalk] Ad Hom Farce Judy Taylor
- Re: [TruthTalk] Ad Hom Farce Knpraise
- Re: [TruthTalk] Ad Hom Farce Knpraise
- Re: [TruthTalk] Ad Hom Farce Knpraise
- Re: [TruthTalk] Ad Hom Farce Knpraise

