There is but one criterion - Jesus Himself, His Faithfulness.
IMO they and, many others censured by you qualify for participation in His Faithfulness. Now, as to whether they do or not, I'd simply add the following; they need not subscribe to your (or my) traditional understanding of the Gospel for this to be true.Everyone on TT interprets and articulates aberrantly on occasion.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: February 07, 2005 08:16
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Basis of Unity

 
 
The Fatherhood of God and the Brotherhood of Man was never a Christian concept; this comes out of Freemasonry an antichrist system which in turn came out of the ancient pagan mystery religions.  The criteria for being kin to Jesus is "doing the will of the Father"  Upon what basis or why would you include the Pope and Bruce Cockburn in this Lance?
 
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 04:28:10 -0800 (PST) Kevin Deegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
No Brothers of mine maybe yours!  The Pope has been called his Hellishness & AntiChrist for good reason Maybe a few who call themselves Evangelical (ECT) and the Nothingarians would speak of this ANTI Christ as a Brother. Some kin of yours?

Lance Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You are wrong concerning Bruce Cockburn and the Pope as THEY ARE YOUR BROTHERS IN CHRIST. IFF you are a believer then, you have no choice in this matter.
UNITY IN THE FAITH

The Key here is "in the faith" not outside it or by bringing the world the Flesh & the Devil in

That seems to be todays popular notion of Unity. How else can we have Unity with Pagan notions? There is a Biblical doctrine of separation, it is not popular. We are not to be yoked with unbelievers.

I care not to have Unity with Bruce Cockburn, the POPE, LDS & every false way

Walter Cradock was a Welsh Nonconformist preacher or Puritan who was decried by his enemies as a "Bold, Ignorant Fellow"
 

Reply via email to